Costs Awards in Employment Tribunals
Meredith Hurst Monday, June 17, 2013
Costs awards in Employment Tribunals remain the exception rather than the rule. However, a recent Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment shows that even extremely high costs awards may be made in suitable cases. In Vaughan v London Borough of Lewisham a costs award of £87,000 against an unsuccessful Claimant was upheld even though the Claimant was unrepresented and there had been no costs warning or a deposit order. Furthermore the fact that the Claimant was unemployed did not invalidate the award.
However, the question of when costs should be awarded and the amount of those costs does remain somewhat unclear, as another recent EAT decision shows. In Howman v Queen Elizabeth Hospital the EAT found that an Employment Tribunal erred in law in awarding costs of £43,076 against an unsuccessful Claimant, despite the Tribunal finding that the Claimant must have known that his case "never had a chance of success". The Tribunal ordered the Claimant to pay his former employer's costs on an indemnity basis, meaning that it was for the Claimant to show that the costs were unreasonable if he wished to challenge the amount of costs. The EAT held that costs awards were exceptional, and for costs to be awarded on an indemnity basis must mean that the case was even more exceptional than the exceptional cases in which it was appropriate to make a costs order. The Employment Tribunal had not considered this when making the costs order. Furthermore the EAT held that the Tribunal had erred in not considering the impact on the Claimant of his losing his house or the impact of the costs award on his family.
Both these recent cases indicate that costs awards are a difficult area, in that it is difficult to predict whether a case is or will be one which an Employment Tribunal holds is suitable for a costs award to be made.
Although the threat of a costs award may be of tactical assistance to employers in defending Employment Tribunal claims it is possible that the introduction of Employment Tribunal fees from 29 July 2013 will have more impact in deterring claims, particularly those where the employee knows that their case lacks merits. However, any impact on unmeritorious claims may be affected by the fact that there will be fee remission based on means. Ultimately only time will tell if the introduction of Tribunal fees has any significant impact on the number of claims presented to Employment Tribunals.
All Categories
Tags
- acas process
- Advicate General's Opinion
- age
- Andrew Brown
- anxiety
- Asda
- ASDA equal pay claims
- Ayodele v Citylink
- bear
- Bear Scotland
- benefits
- bereavement leave
- bonus
- bonuses
- Breach of Privacy
- breach of contract
- British Airways
- bullying
- burden of proof
- business conference
- business event
- capability
- capacity dismissal
- care industry
- care workers
- case law
- changes to employment law
- Chestertons v Nurmohamed
- Christmas
- CIPD
- CJEU
- Collective Consultation
- comparator
- Compensation
- compromise agreement
- conduct
- Constructive Dismissal
- contract of employment
- control
- court of appeal
- Court of Appeal
- David Gray Jones
- Deliveroo
- depression
- disability
- disability discrimination
- discrimination
- dismissal
- Dutch Property
- EAT
- ECJ
- Efobi v Royal Mail
- employment
- Employment Appeal Tribunal
- employment law
- Employment Law
- employment law update
- employment rights
- employment status
- employment tribunal
- Employment tribunal fees
- Employment Tribunal Fees
- equal pay
- Equal Pay
- Essop
- fathers' rights
- fit for work
- Fries v Lufthansa
- gig economy
- GMB
- Government Legal Service v Brookes
- harassment
- headscarves
- holiday
- Holiday
- holiday pay
- HR
- HR professional
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Immigration Law event
- indirect discrimination
- Inequality
- interview
- IOD event
- IOD London
- Jeff Bezos
- Jenna Ide
- Johnson exclusion
- Jonathan Mansfield
- Jose Mourinho
- Jose Mourinho's treatment of Chelsea doctor Eva Carneiro
- Kaltoft
- legal issues
- litigation
- Llama
- Lock v British Gas
- London
- London event
- Meerkat
- Mitchell v Marks and Spencer
- Monkey
- Naeem
- New York Times
- Obesity
- objective justification
- organised grouping
- paternity leave
- pay
- Pay
- perks
- Pimlico Plumbers
- probationary period
- Property Portfolio
- protected characteristic
- protected disclosure
- psychometric testing
- PTSD
- public interest
- Public Interest Disclosure Act
- race discrimination
- Rawlinson v Brightside
- reasonable adjustments
- refund
- retirement age
- Rynda
- self employed
- self-employed
- self-employment
- Selsdon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes
- seminar
- sleep in care workers
- Starbucks
- stress
- Supreme Court
- Thomas Mansfield Solicitors Limited
- time off
- time off work
- Transfer
- Transfer of Undertakings
- tribunal cases
- TUPE
- TUPE 2006
- TUPE 2014
- Uber
- Undertakings
- unfair dismissal
- Unfair Dismissal
- Unfair Dismissal.
- unpaid parental leave
- Walker v Sita
- worker
- workers
- workers' rights
- working conditons
- working time
- workplace dresscode
- workshop
- World Economic Forum
- Wrongful dismissal
- age discrimination
- Age discrimination
- Amazon
- Brexit
- Chelsea Football Club
- direct discrimination
- disability discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- discrimimation
- dresscode
- employment law
- Employment law
- Employment Law 2017
- employment status
- Employment Tribunal
- employment tribunal claims
- Employment Tribunal Reforms
- Gender Pay Gap
- General Election Conservative Employment Law Legislation Immigration Human Rights Act Work and Family Manifesto Zero Hours Contracts National Minimum Wage Trade Unions
- Hidden Disabilities
- holiday pay
- Holiday Pay
- indirect discrimination
- London Zoo
- National Minimum Wage
- parental leave
- recruitment
- Recruitment
- Redundancy
- Romania
- settlement agreement
- settlement agreements
- Thomas Mansfield Solicitors Limited
- time off for emergencies
- trust and confidence
- TUPE
- Uber
- unfair dismissal
- Unfair Dismissal
- Whistleblowing
- workers rights
Latest Comments
Archive
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
-
2015
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- May
- April
-
February
- TUPE: Single employee can amount to an organised grouping - 25th February 2015
- Unfair dismissal and investigations - 24th February 2015
- Upcoming seminars / workshops in 2015 - 23rd February 2015
- The perks of old age? - 18th February 2015
- Holiday Pay - 18th February 2015
- Are the obese protected from disability discrimination? - 5th February 2015
- 2014
-
2013
- December
- November
- October
- September
-
August
- Not in my house you don’t! Bed and Breakfast and the Sexual Orientation Regulations - 7th August 2013
- Holiday pay and overtime: a logistical headache? - 7th August 2013
- Protected conversations – what does this change for employers? - 7th August 2013
- Introduction of Employment Tribunal Fees - 7th August 2013
- June
- May
- April
- February
- January
-
2012
- June
-
April
- Employment Law Changes – April 2012 - 16th April 2012
- Criminal Conduct in the Workplace - 16th April 2012
- Case Report – Teggart v TeleTech UK Limited - 16th April 2012
- Mediation – what part should it play in helping to resolve workplace disputes? - 16th April 2012
- What is the Employee’s last date of employment? - 16th April 2012
- March
- February
-
2011
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
-
February
- All aboard - 25th February 2011
- Time to train? - 22nd February 2011
- Crime does pay - 22nd February 2011
- Abolition of the default retirement age - 18th February 2011
- A bumpy ride - 11th February 2011
- Equality is good for business - 11th February 2011
- Are you being served? - 4th February 2011
- Don't miss out on our free retirement seminar - 9 March 2011! - 2nd February 2011
-
January
- Employment law shake-up announced - 28th January 2011
- Limit on tribunal awards to increase - 25th January 2011
- Paternity leave overhall - 20th January 2011
- CRB checks - 13th January 2011
- Default retirement age to be abolished - 13th January 2011
- Unfair dismissal rights set to change - 12th January 2011
- 2010
- 2009
0 Comments :