Employer's impartial grievance appeal process - Case
Meredith Hurst Friday, September 20, 2013
Constructive Dismissal: Failure to Provide Impartial Grievance Appeal Process
Blackburn v Aldi Stores Ltd
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that an employer's failure to consider an employee's appeal impartially, could amount to a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.
The Employment Rights Act 1996 provides that dismissal can occur where the contract is terminated by the employer or, by the employee, in response to the employer's conduct.
The second type of dismissal is what has come to be known as 'constructive dismissal'. Case law which has developed in this area, tells us that an employer must not, without reasonable and proper cause, conduct itself in a manner calculated or likely to seriously damage or destroy the relationship of trust and confidence between the parties. This is the so-called implied term of trust and confidence.
A breach of an implied contractual term has the same effect as a breach of an express (written) term and will provide the basis for a constructive dismissal claim. The breach of the implied or express term must be fundamental. In other words, the breach must go to the root of the contract so as to destroy it.
The breach of itself does not end the contract. Generally, for a constructive dismissal claim to be successful, the employee must resign in response to the breach and in so doing, bring the contract to an end. The employee must also not delay too long before accepting the breach as otherwise; an Employment Tribunal may be entitled to find that the employee has waived the breach and accepted the status quo.
This case concerns the failure by the employer (Aldi) to adhere to its grievance procedure. The Employment Tribunal hearing the case, made a mistake in finding that in the absence of a breach of an express term, what took place at an appeal hearing was irrelevant.
Mr Blackburn worked as a driver for Aldi. In June 2009, he presented a grievance concerning health and safety issues, lack of training and his alleged mistreatment by the deputy transport manager who apparently swore at Mr Blackburn on two occasions. Aldi's written grievance procedure provided that grievances must be handled by a section manager and that any appeals were to be notified to the next level of management in writing.
Mr Blackburn's grievance was heard by the regional managing director. He rejected the allegations of abuse by the deputy transport manager. Mr Blackburn appealed and the same regional managing director then heard the appeal. He dismissed the appeal after a meeting which lasted just 20 minutes.
Mr Blackburn resigned asserting constructive unfair dismissal. He argued that Aldi had denied him a fair appeal.
The Employment Tribunal hearing the case at the first instance rejected his claim. It found that health and safety concerns were largely historic and that the regional managing director had given proper consideration to Mr Blackburn's grievance. It reached no findings about the appeal hearing.
Mr Blackburn appealed to the EAT which held that the right to an impartial appeal is an important feature of the ACAS Code and was also (in this case) part of the employer's own procedure. What was important here was that the EAT was not convinced that a large employer like Aldi had been unable to provide an impartial hearing by a manager not previously involved.
More importantly, the EAT found that failure to adhere to a grievance procedureiscapable of amounting to, or at the very least, contributing to a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. Whether it does so in a particular case is of course a question of fact for the Tribunal to assess. Each case will turn on its merits. Failing to deal with a grievance process quickly may not amount to a breach, whereas a complete failure to respond to a grievance is likely to do so.
What the Employment Tribunal had failed to do in this case was make findings of fact about the appeal hearing. It failed to consider whether the appeal hearing amounted to conduct calculated or likely to destroy, or seriously damage, the relationship of trust and confidence.
The EAT found that failure to allow an impartial appeal of a grievance decision may amount to a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.
This is a salutary lesson to employers who fail to deal with grievances properly. It was notable in this case, that Aldi is a large employer and as such the EAT gave it far less latitude than it might have done with a smaller organisation. Even so, it is always better wherever possible to ensure that each stage of an internal process (be it a disciplinary or grievance process) is heard by an independent person.
All Categories
Tags
- acas process
- Advicate General's Opinion
- age
- Andrew Brown
- anxiety
- Asda
- ASDA equal pay claims
- Ayodele v Citylink
- bear
- Bear Scotland
- benefits
- bereavement leave
- bonus
- bonuses
- Breach of Privacy
- breach of contract
- British Airways
- bullying
- burden of proof
- business conference
- business event
- capability
- capacity dismissal
- care industry
- care workers
- case law
- changes to employment law
- Chestertons v Nurmohamed
- Christmas
- CIPD
- CJEU
- Collective Consultation
- comparator
- Compensation
- compromise agreement
- conduct
- Constructive Dismissal
- contract of employment
- control
- court of appeal
- Court of Appeal
- David Gray Jones
- Deliveroo
- depression
- disability
- disability discrimination
- discrimination
- dismissal
- Dutch Property
- EAT
- ECJ
- Efobi v Royal Mail
- employment
- Employment Appeal Tribunal
- employment law
- Employment Law
- employment law update
- employment rights
- employment status
- employment tribunal
- Employment tribunal fees
- Employment Tribunal Fees
- equal pay
- Equal Pay
- Essop
- fathers' rights
- fit for work
- Fries v Lufthansa
- gig economy
- GMB
- Government Legal Service v Brookes
- harassment
- headscarves
- holiday
- Holiday
- holiday pay
- HR
- HR professional
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Immigration Law event
- indirect discrimination
- Inequality
- interview
- IOD event
- IOD London
- Jeff Bezos
- Jenna Ide
- Johnson exclusion
- Jonathan Mansfield
- Jose Mourinho
- Jose Mourinho's treatment of Chelsea doctor Eva Carneiro
- Kaltoft
- legal issues
- litigation
- Llama
- Lock v British Gas
- London
- London event
- Meerkat
- Mitchell v Marks and Spencer
- Monkey
- Naeem
- New York Times
- Obesity
- objective justification
- organised grouping
- paternity leave
- pay
- Pay
- perks
- Pimlico Plumbers
- probationary period
- Property Portfolio
- protected characteristic
- protected disclosure
- psychometric testing
- PTSD
- public interest
- Public Interest Disclosure Act
- race discrimination
- Rawlinson v Brightside
- reasonable adjustments
- refund
- retirement age
- Rynda
- self employed
- self-employed
- self-employment
- Selsdon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes
- seminar
- sleep in care workers
- Starbucks
- stress
- Supreme Court
- Thomas Mansfield Solicitors Limited
- time off
- time off work
- Transfer
- Transfer of Undertakings
- tribunal cases
- TUPE
- TUPE 2006
- TUPE 2014
- Uber
- Undertakings
- unfair dismissal
- Unfair Dismissal
- Unfair Dismissal.
- unpaid parental leave
- Walker v Sita
- worker
- workers
- workers' rights
- working conditons
- working time
- workplace dresscode
- workshop
- World Economic Forum
- Wrongful dismissal
- age discrimination
- Age discrimination
- Amazon
- Brexit
- Chelsea Football Club
- direct discrimination
- disability discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- discrimimation
- dresscode
- employment law
- Employment law
- Employment Law 2017
- employment status
- Employment Tribunal
- employment tribunal claims
- Employment Tribunal Reforms
- Gender Pay Gap
- General Election Conservative Employment Law Legislation Immigration Human Rights Act Work and Family Manifesto Zero Hours Contracts National Minimum Wage Trade Unions
- Hidden Disabilities
- holiday pay
- Holiday Pay
- indirect discrimination
- London Zoo
- National Minimum Wage
- parental leave
- recruitment
- Recruitment
- Redundancy
- Romania
- settlement agreement
- settlement agreements
- Thomas Mansfield Solicitors Limited
- time off for emergencies
- trust and confidence
- TUPE
- Uber
- unfair dismissal
- Unfair Dismissal
- Whistleblowing
- workers rights
Latest Comments
Archive
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
-
2015
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- May
- April
-
February
- TUPE: Single employee can amount to an organised grouping - 25th February 2015
- Unfair dismissal and investigations - 24th February 2015
- Upcoming seminars / workshops in 2015 - 23rd February 2015
- The perks of old age? - 18th February 2015
- Holiday Pay - 18th February 2015
- Are the obese protected from disability discrimination? - 5th February 2015
- 2014
-
2013
- December
- November
- October
- September
-
August
- Not in my house you don’t! Bed and Breakfast and the Sexual Orientation Regulations - 7th August 2013
- Holiday pay and overtime: a logistical headache? - 7th August 2013
- Protected conversations – what does this change for employers? - 7th August 2013
- Introduction of Employment Tribunal Fees - 7th August 2013
- June
- May
- April
- February
- January
-
2012
- June
-
April
- Employment Law Changes – April 2012 - 16th April 2012
- Criminal Conduct in the Workplace - 16th April 2012
- Case Report – Teggart v TeleTech UK Limited - 16th April 2012
- Mediation – what part should it play in helping to resolve workplace disputes? - 16th April 2012
- What is the Employee’s last date of employment? - 16th April 2012
- March
- February
-
2011
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
-
February
- All aboard - 25th February 2011
- Time to train? - 22nd February 2011
- Crime does pay - 22nd February 2011
- Abolition of the default retirement age - 18th February 2011
- A bumpy ride - 11th February 2011
- Equality is good for business - 11th February 2011
- Are you being served? - 4th February 2011
- Don't miss out on our free retirement seminar - 9 March 2011! - 2nd February 2011
-
January
- Employment law shake-up announced - 28th January 2011
- Limit on tribunal awards to increase - 25th January 2011
- Paternity leave overhall - 20th January 2011
- CRB checks - 13th January 2011
- Default retirement age to be abolished - 13th January 2011
- Unfair dismissal rights set to change - 12th January 2011
- 2010
- 2009
0 Comments :